There are policy decisions that arrive quietly, almost unnoticed, yet speak volumes about a country’s state of mind. China’s recent move to remove VAT exemption on contraceptives is one of them. On paper, it looks like a technical adjustment — a fiscal tweak meant to make products less affordable. In reality, it is a small window into a much larger unease: a nation grappling with the consequences of its own demographic transformation.
For decades, China worried about having too many people. Now, it worries about having too few — or, more precisely, too few young people, too few births, too many elderly, and a social contract under strain. The decision to intervene in something as intimate as contraception pricing is not about morality or ideology. It is about arithmetic. And arithmetic, in the end, governs everything from pensions to power.
Walking through Chinese cities over the years — from the megacities of the coast to the quieter provincial towns — I have often been struck by the contrast between scale and silence. Streets are busy, subways packed, shopping malls alive. And yet, playgrounds feel emptier than they once were. Schools merge instead of expanding. Young couples move through life cautiously, calculating costs, careers, apartments, parents — and often deciding that one child, or none at all, is the only manageable option.
The VAT decision fits into this context. By increasing the cost of contraceptives, the state acknowledges a basic truth: family planning is no longer about limiting births, but about managing choices. In a society where economic pressure, housing prices, work culture and childcare costs loom large, reproduction has become a carefully negotiated decision rather than an assumed stage of life. The government can encourage births through slogans and subsidies, but it cannot reverse decades of structural change overnight.
China’s shrinking population is no longer a projection; it is a lived reality. Fewer newborns mean fewer future workers. Fewer workers mean slower growth, higher dependency ratios, and rising pressure on public finances. The famous “demographic dividend” that fueled China’s economic rise is fading, replaced by what economists politely call “demographic headwinds.” For ordinary people, this translates into longer working lives, uncertainty about pensions, and a quiet anxiety about who will care for whom.
What makes this moment particularly complex is that demographic change is not just statistical — it is emotional. Many young Chinese grew up as only children. They carry the weight of supporting two parents and four grandparents, often while living far from their hometowns. Parenthood, once framed as duty or continuity, is now weighed against freedom, stability, and mental health. In this light, a tax policy on contraceptives becomes part of a broader negotiation between state ambition and personal survival.
Long-term planning, both individual and national, becomes harder in such an environment. Cities must rethink infrastructure designed for perpetual growth. Companies must adjust to a smaller labor pool. Families must redefine what support networks look like in an aging society. And policymakers must accept that reversing demographic decline is far more difficult than engineering it in the first place.
From the outside, China’s demographic dilemma is often discussed in abstract terms — charts, curves, projections. From the inside, it unfolds in kitchens, nurseries that remain unused, and conversations postponed indefinitely. The VAT decision is a reminder that even the most technocratic systems ultimately intersect with human lives, bodies, and choices.
Demography moves slowly, but its effects are relentless. China is now living inside the long shadow of its past policies, trying to adapt without fully controlling the outcome. The question is no longer how to manage population growth, but how to live — thoughtfully and sustainably — with less.
Photographs taken during my stays in 2024–2025 in Xintiandi, Shanghai’s pedestrian district near my office. In these frames, I am often drawn to people in motion, whose presence animates the urban landscape through style, gesture, and behavior.
Shot with a Leica M11 Monochrom and a Sony RX1R II.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It has been more than fifty years since I began traveling across the world — and the seven seas — for work or for pleasure, always with a Leica M camera close at hand. The camera has never been an accessory; it has been a constant companion, a way of observing, remembering, and making sense of the places and people I encountered along the way. I started keeping this kind of journal some time ago, not as a diary in the traditional sense, but as a space where images and words could meet. This is not a publication driven by schedules or algorithms. At times I disappear for long stretches; then, inevitably, I return with semi-regular updates. Publishing, for me, is a mirror of my state of mind and emotions. It follows my rhythm, not the other way around. You have to take it exactly as it comes. Every photograph you see here is mine. They are fragments of a life spent moving, looking, and waiting for moments to reveal themselves — often quietly, sometimes unexpectedly. This blog is not about destinations, but about presence. About what remains when the journey slows down and the shutter finally clicks.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.